ATINER |
Athens
Institute for Education and Research |
Paper Guidelines
Please read the following guidelines carefully and adjust
your paper accordingly before final submission
Word Template for Atiner
papers
Author's name and surname
author's position
author's affiliation
1st line of address
2nd line of address
Telephone
number, incl. country code
author's E-mail address
(the same for other authors, if
any)
Abstract
max 300 words.
Keywords: the most representative 5 (five) keywords.
Paper
From
5000 to 10000 words.
A typical paper
structure, with the main sections (of course deviations from this format are
acceptable, depending on the requirements of each paper).
Literature Review
Methodology
Findings/Results
Discussion
Conclusions
·
Please
use a 12-point Times Roman font in the title page and in the body of paper.
Table 1. Table captions
should be placed above the table
Graphics |
Top |
In-between |
Bottom |
Tables |
End |
Last |
First |
Figures |
Good |
Similar |
Very well |
Source: WHO 2010.
Figure
1. Figure captions should
be placed above the table
The
heading of a section should be in Times New Roman 12-point bold in all-capitals flush left. (i.e. The Health Spendings)
The
heading of subsections should be in Times New Roman 12-point italics with only the initial letters capitalized, flush left. (Note: For subsections and sub-subsections, a word like the or a is not capitalized unless it is the
first word of the header.) (i.e. The
Health Spendings)
The
heading for sub-subsections should be in Times New Roman 12-point
underlined with initial letters capitalized, with flush left. (i.e. The
Health Spendings)
The
heading for sub-subsections should be in Times New Roman 12-point
with only the first word initial letter capitalized and flush left. (i.e. The health spendings)
Sub-subsections
The
heading for sub-subsections should be in Times New Roman 12-point
with only the first word initial letter capitalized, and flush left. (i.e. The health spendings)
Our thanks
to “…” for allowing us to modify templates they had developed.
Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning
about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program.
Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795-825. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/161468.16147.
Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997. A Study on Video
Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park.
Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device
for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands,
April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM, New York,
NY, 526-531. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332491.
Tavel, P. 2007. Modeling and
Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd., Natick, MA.
Sannella, M. J. 1994. Constraint
Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., University of Washington.
Forman, G. 2003.
An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for
text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003),
1289-1305.
Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User
Interface Software and Technology (Vancouver, Canada, November 02 - 05,
2003). UIST '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1-10. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964696.964697.
Yu, Y. T. and Lau, M. F. 2006. A
comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical
decisions. J. Syst. Softw. 79, 5 (May.
2006), 577-590. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.05.030.
Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application
requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender,
Ed. ACM Press Frontier Series. ACM, New York, NY, 19-33. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/90417.90738.